Make an adjustment. Support it. What does USPAP say? Nothing. It’s not in the integrity standards. It’s not in the performance standards. What does the AI Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal say? It doesn’t define it. However, it does explain the result of adjustments: “Mathematical changes made to market data to facilitate comparison of understanding.” […]
If your work is reliable, it’s credible. If it’s credible it may not be reliable. USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) defines credible as “worthy of belief.” So how does one strive to be worthy? Well the automatic answers are . . . automatic: 1) have education/training; 2) have experience; 3) have integrity. Let’s […]
Vintage appraisal focuses on a point value opinion. In reality, clients need help with estimating collateral risk, or investment potential. Risk or reliability, if measured, is the uncertainty of the analyzed result, or the opinion of value. Lenders, investors, portfolio managers today are aware of the power of today’s technology. They need a measure of […]
[This is Part 3 of a series on Appraisal Modernization] “Appraisal modernization” is a crisp way to describe needed change. But what is really needed? To consider this question, in part 3, we must look at underlying motive. If we only look at the surface solution stuff, like “hybrid appraisals” we may be distracted from […]
Appraiser training tells us to use good judgment – repeatedly. In fact, the word ‘judgment’ is used over 300 times in the current USPAP book. It must be important. It’s also used some 800 times in The Appraisal of Real Estate. It must be important. The basis of appraisal theory in the United States is […]
What is an “accurate” appraisal? First, we note that in Standard 1 of USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice), accuracy is not required. What is required is that an appraisal be credible, or “worthy of belief.” Perhaps reviewers know how to judge “accuracy.” Good news. Standard 3 does say specifically that the reviewer must […]