We’ve seen the standard which requires an appraiser to use ‘correct’ methods (whatever those may be). And which also requires the appraiser to use ‘sufficient’ care (whatever that is). All part of the legacy USPAP Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Be correct and be careful! Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.15 of George […]
Quasi-government “Congressionally-authorized” appraisal standards require “correct” research and analyses. What does that mean? What is correct? And who decides? It’s in Standard 1. Be correct. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.14 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. Does this say – it’s […]
Assume what condition your assumption is in! Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.13 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. Assumptions are a critical part of all analyses or reasoning logic. Assumptions about assumptions are interesting. Two starting points are assumed: 1) the […]
Scope of Work is what you plan to do. It requires you to identify the problem and identify the work necessary. The goal of USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) is credibility. The appraiser should be “worthy of belief.” A measure of reliability or usefulness of the appraisal is not required. Editor’s Note: This […]
You MUST make adjustments. Everybody knows that! Or not. In USPAP and The Appraisal of Real Estate (TARE) we have two predominant topical sources. The USPAP standards do not require adjustments. The word “comparable” is not defined, nor is the word “adjustment” found in USPAP. Nothing about adjustments nor picking comps. However, we note that […]
Scope of Work is required in legacy appraisal practice. Data Science (and Evidence Based Valuation) are more based on principles of good science. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.11 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. To sum up, the goal of traditional […]
Analyst Appraisers are replacing “Opinion” Appraisers! (Trust me … ) Why? How? Huh? In the late 1900’s, appraisers were handicapped! Typewriter. Telephone. Assessor data. Quarterly MLS comp books, No compiled commercial data at all! Collecting comp data was 80% of the battle. Get four or five and you were “almost done.” Make some adjustments from […]
How do you measure “close enough” to a market value? We have standards you know! Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.10 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. Valuation is numbers. Some numbers are numbers, like building SqFt. Other numbers are exact like […]
The USPAP “Competency Rule” is straightforward. It says you must be competent! For any given assignment, “being competent” requires the appraiser to: “properly” identify the problem; have knowledge and experience to be competent; recognize and comply with applicable laws and regulations. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.9 of George Dell’s series on How Do […]
Is USPAP biased? (Appraisal Foundation, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) Is this possible? It can’t be! This part 8 of a multipart look at issues in valuation standards. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.8 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. Let’s […]
Change. It’s clear that appraisal, as a vocation, has changed. Many appraisers are considering new careers. Others are preparing to meet new demands. Yet others are doing . . . nothing. Which mind are you? Escape. Retool. Or be in denial. I have taught with Valuemetrics.info for over 17 years now. And was on the […]
Workfile is required, (or not?). This part 7 of a multipart look at issues in valuation standards. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.7 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. USPAP WORKFILE The “workfile” concept works well as an effort at documenting an […]
What!? Universal Valuation Standards? Not possible! This part 6 of a multipart look at issues in valuation standards. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.6 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. The ‘possibility’ premise, however, is that all valuations follow the same logic […]
We continue our look at how current standards, and regulations hold back best practices. This part 5 of a multipart look at issues in valuation standards. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.5 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. This part is interesting […]
Standards: Credible v Reliable. Editor’s Note: This is Standards, part 3.4 of George Dell’s series on How Do I Move to EBV? Links to the earlier posts are here. Here, we specifically note how the goal of having valuation standards can be updated to reflect today’s complete data, and computation analytics can be optimized for […]
